Last week, criminals took roughly $90 million in digital assets from cryptocurrency wallets by concealing password-capturing components inside small USB-like devices that are marketed as the safest way for investors to store access to their tokens.
The tokens were taken from the wallets of customers of Ledger, a French company, which called the incident one of the most sophisticated attacks the crypto industry has experienced.
Ledger sells small devices resembling USB sticks that allow investors to store the password to their digital tokens securely and offline, as a safeguard against the theft of their passwords and assets.
On Thursday, the company said that organized criminals had spent several months purchasing authentic Ledger devices, opening them, installing custom-made hidden components built to record the recovery phrase during setup, and then reintroducing the devices into circulation through resellers in Southeast Asia.
Weaknesses in the anti-money laundering program at Stockholm-based Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken surfaced after the 2016 Panama Papers leak, which implicated hundreds of banks.
The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) announced on Thursday that SEB, based in Stockholm, Sweden, and its sole New York branch agreed to pay $33 million to settle an investigation into the bank’s anti-money laundering program.
The investigation originated with the Panama Papers. The 2016 leak of 11.5 million financial and legal documents from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca exposed that hundreds of banks had failed to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, including those related to money laundering and offshore activity.
Acting NYDFS Superintendent Kaitlin Asrow said in a prepared statement that financial institutions must comply with New York’s strict laws and regulations to protect the integrity of the financial system, and that the department will hold accountable any entities that fall short of those standards.
The NYDFS investigation found that SEB’s Bank Secrecy Act/AML program carried out inadequate customer due diligence and did not address the heightened money laundering risk posed by high-risk clients. According to a consent order issued by the agency, these problems persisted from 2015 to 2019.
The agency said the bank, which holds $370.2 billion in assets, failed to perform adequate due diligence on high-risk correspondent banking partners, including foreign institutions, maintained incomplete client files, assessed AML risk poorly, and did not properly update its procedures for correspondent banking relationships. The agency also found that SEB’s transaction monitoring program in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania was not adequately equipped to detect and block suspicious activity.